Humans are an endlessly fascinating species, full of contradictions and layers. One of the most striking distinctions I’ve observed is between two types of people: the rule-followers and the free spirits. At first glance, it seems obvious which type might hold more power in day-to-day life. Rule-followers appear to dominate small social ecosystems — offices, families, even casual social groups — because they know how to manipulate the system. They can be vindictive, they can enforce petty rules, and they often take satisfaction in exerting control over others who simply want to live freely.
Free spirits, by contrast, are the ones who resist control, question authority, and live according to their own code. They are creative, independent, and often unwilling to sacrifice integrity for the sake of compliance. But this freedom comes with costs. Free spirits can appear vulnerable to the rule-followers’ manipulation because they refuse to play the games of small power. They risk social friction, professional sabotage, or simply being ignored or sidelined.
Yet there’s a paradox here: the very people who seem to hold power over us in small settings — the bullies, the enforcers, the obsessively rule-abiding — are often themselves constrained by a larger system. Their power is limited to the scope of rules that govern their world, and they can rarely break beyond that without consequences. Free spirits, on the other hand, tap into a different kind of influence. They inspire, they innovate, they bend perception without violating morality. While a rule-follower might enforce a rule, a free spirit can redefine the environment itself.
This dynamic isn’t just personal; it scales upward. Consider politics, governance, and global power structures. Many aspects of our political climate — whether democratic, socialist, communist, or dictatorial — create a trickle-down effect that can reinforce small-scale “bully-like” behavior. Family members, coworkers, or ordinary citizens sometimes mirror the rigid enforcement of rules that originates at the highest levels of power. Meanwhile, the most powerful entities, behind closed doors, often know exactly how to bend or break rules with legal or political cover. Wars, political distractions, and schemes — from Vietnam to the Gulf War, from “wag the dog” operations to countless less-publicized maneuvers — reveal how attention can be diverted while the powerful manipulate systems beyond the view of ordinary people.
It’s tempting to see rule-followers as small tyrants who simply make life miserable for others, but in a broader context, even they are participants in a human ecosystem shaped by larger forces. The irony is that some of the people who appear to follow every rule are, in fact, the same ones who wield enormous influence — their compliance and outward obedience masking a deep understanding of when and how to bend the rules to their advantage.
Even so, I remain hopeful about human nature. While rule-followers will always exist, humanity is slowly evolving toward something more peaceful and less destructive. By many measures — historical records, biblical text, and modern statistics — we are far less violent than in the past. Bombings and massacres are increasingly political and strategic rather than sheer acts of uncontrolled destruction. Despite the exponential growth of the world’s population, humanity per capita is making progress toward empathy, cooperation, and self-restraint.
Ultimately, free spirits remind us that the true power is not always visible on the surface. It is not held in the strict enforcement of rules or petty domination. It is held in creativity, integrity, and the ability to influence without coercion. Rule-followers may dominate in the short term, creating discomfort, stress, or suffering, but over the long arc of time, the influence of free spirits — those who live authentically and challenge the status quo — proves to be more profound.
We are not perfect, and we still have far to go. But history suggests that humanity is capable of learning, growing, and achieving a more humane existence. Free spirits teach us that power, in its truest form, is not about control over others but mastery of oneself — and the courage to shape the world according to values, not fear.
———-
A Second Conclusion: The True Nature of Humanity
While the world often appears fractured, fearful, and suspicious, this is not the full story. Much of what we see — the news of wars, political schemes, and conflicts in faraway places — can make it feel as though people are increasingly wary or even hostile toward one another. Yet, pound for pound, human beings are inherently loving, peaceful, and supportive when given the space and opportunity to be so. Most people, the ones next door, at work, in our communities, do not wish harm on others; they are simply living their lives, trying to do their best.
The fear, suspicion, and anger that we witness are often products of insecurity or defensive reactions to the very systems — political, economic, or social — that amplify these tensions. They do not define our essential nature. Deep down, humans are capable of generosity, empathy, and kindness. When we remember this, when we step back from the headlines and the pressures of daily life, it becomes clear: the world is not as cruel or dangerous as it sometimes appears.
We are, at our core, beings of love and decency. Yes, harm happens, and mistakes are made, but the vast majority of our actions, day to day, are constructive, compassionate, and affirming of life. Recognizing this truth allows us to live without succumbing to paranoia or cynicism. It reminds us that, even amid fear and complexity, humanity is steadily moving toward greater understanding, care, and connection.
In short: while the rule-followers may enforce rules and stir tension, and while the free spirits may challenge the world, the ultimate story is one of enduring human goodness. Beneath the noise and the conflicts, the heart of humanity remains loving, generous, and hopeful.
——————
